This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
1.2. | What is CDR and how is it different from CCUS? |
1.3. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (1/2) |
1.4. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (2/2) |
1.5. | The CDR business model and its challenges |
1.6. | Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR |
1.7. | What is needed to further develop the CDR sector? |
1.8. | CDR technology benchmarking |
1.9. | The potential of DACCS as a CDR solution |
1.10. | The DACCS market is nascent but growing |
1.11. | Direct air capture company landscape |
1.12. | DACCS: key messages |
1.13. | Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) |
1.14. | The status and outlook of BECCS |
1.15. | Biochar and bio-oil |
1.16. | The state of the biochar market |
1.17. | Afforestation and reforestation (A/R) |
1.18. | Forestry offset credits are a large opportunity for CDR |
1.19. | Mineralization-based NETs |
1.20. | Ocean-based NETs |
1.21. | Carbon dioxide removal: Key messages |
1.22. | CO2 removal volume capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
1.23. | CO2 removal revenue forecast (million USD) |
1.24. | CDR market forecast: Key messages |
2. | INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL ANALYSIS |
2.1.1. | What is carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.2. | Description of the main CDR methods |
2.1.3. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.4. | What is the difference between CDR and CCUS? |
2.1.5. | The cost and abatement potential of NETs |
2.1.6. | CDR technology benchmarking |
2.1.7. | Status and potential of CDR technologies |
2.1.8. | How expensive is CDR today? |
2.1.9. | Current CDR price by company and technology |
2.1.10. | Potential non-carbon revenue streams of various CDR technologies |
2.1.11. | Geological storage is not the only permanent destination for CO₂ |
2.1.12. | The challenge of permanence in CDR |
2.1.13. | Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR |
2.1.14. | The role of policy on CDR deployment |
2.1.15. | CDR: deferring the problem? |
2.1.16. | What is needed to further develop the CDR sector? |
2.2. | Latest developments in the CDR industry |
2.2.1. | The CDR market is gaining traction |
2.2.2. | CDR initiatives launched at COP26 |
2.2.3. | The Xprize Carbon Removal: start-ups by technology |
2.3. | The carbon dioxide removal market |
2.3.1. | Carbon removal vs emission reduction offsets (1/2) |
2.3.2. | Carbon removal vs emission reduction offsets (2/2) |
2.3.3. | The state of CDR in the voluntary carbon market |
2.3.4. | The carbon removal market potential |
2.3.5. | Advanced market commitment in CDR |
2.3.6. | What characterizes a high-quality CDR offset? |
2.3.7. | The role of carbon registries in the offset market |
2.3.8. | Challenges in today's carbon market |
2.3.9. | CDR technologies: key takeaways |
3. | DIRECT AIR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (DACCS) |
3.1. | Introduction to direct air capture (DAC) |
3.1.1. | What is direct air capture (DAC)? |
3.1.2. | Why DACCS as a CDR solution? |
3.1.3. | The state of the DAC market |
3.1.4. | Momentum: private investments in DAC |
3.1.5. | Momentum: public investment and policy support for DAC |
3.1.6. | Momentum: DAC leads investor interest in CDR |
3.1.7. | Momentum: DAC-specific regulation |
3.1.8. | DAC land requirement is an advantage |
3.1.9. | DAC vs point-source carbon capture |
3.2. | DAC technologies |
3.2.1. | Direct air capture technologies |
3.2.2. | Liquid solvent-based DAC and alkali looping regeneration |
3.2.3. | DAC solid sorbent swing adsorption processes (1/2) |
3.2.4. | DAC solid sorbent swing adsorption processes (2/2) |
3.2.5. | Electro-swing adsorption of CO₂ for DAC |
3.2.6. | Solid sorbents in DAC |
3.2.7. | Emerging solid sorbent materials for DAC |
3.2.8. | Solid sorbent- vs liquid solvent-based DAC |
3.3. | DAC companies |
3.3.1. | Direct air capture companies |
3.3.2. | Direct air capture company landscape |
3.3.3. | Climeworks |
3.3.4. | Carbon Engineering |
3.3.5. | Global Thermostat |
3.3.6. | A comparison of the main DAC companies |
3.3.7. | CarbonCapture Inc. |
3.3.8. | Verdox |
3.3.9. | Mission Zero Technologies |
3.3.10. | Noya |
3.3.11. | Soletair Power |
3.3.12. | Hydrocell |
3.3.13. | Carbyon |
3.3.14. | Sustaera |
3.3.15. | Infinitree |
3.3.16. | Skytree |
3.3.17. | Prometheus Fuels |
3.4. | DAC challenges |
3.4.1. | Challenges associated with DAC technology (1/2) |
3.4.2. | Challenges associated with DAC technology (2/2) |
3.4.3. | DACCS co-location with geothermal energy |
3.4.4. | Will DAC be deployed in time to make a difference? |
3.4.5. | What can DAC learn from the wind and solar industries' scale-up? |
3.4.6. | What is needed for DAC to achieve the gigatonne capacity by 2050? |
3.5. | DAC economics |
3.5.1. | The economics of DAC |
3.5.2. | The CAPEX of DAC |
3.5.3. | The CAPEX of DAC: sub-system contribution |
3.5.4. | The OPEX of DAC |
3.5.5. | Levelized cost of DAC |
3.5.6. | Financing DAC |
3.5.7. | DACCS SWOT analysis |
3.5.8. | DACCS: summary |
3.5.9. | DACCS: key takeaways |
4. | BIOMASS WITH CARBON REMOVAL AND STORAGE (BICRS) |
4.1.1. | Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) |
4.1.2. | BiCRS possible feedstocks |
4.1.3. | BiCRS conversion pathways |
4.1.4. | CO₂ capture technologies for BiCRS |
4.1.5. | The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS |
4.1.6. | TRL of BiCRS processes and products by feedstock |
4.1.7. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: lignocellulose |
4.1.8. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: organic wastes and oil crops/waste |
4.1.9. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: algae and sugar/starch |
4.1.10. | TRL of BiCRS: discussion |
4.1.11. | The economics of BiCRS |
4.1.12. | The cost of BiCRS as it scales |
4.1.13. | Considerations in large-scale BiCRS deployment |
4.2. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.1. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.2. | Opportunities in BECCS: heat generation |
4.2.3. | Opportunities in BECCS: waste-to-energy |
4.2.4. | BECCUS current status |
4.2.5. | Trends in BECCUS projects (1/2) |
4.2.6. | Trends in BECCUS projects (2/2) |
4.2.7. | The challenges of BECCS |
4.2.8. | What is the business model for BECCS? |
4.2.9. | The energy and carbon efficiency of BECCS |
4.2.10. | Is BECCS sustainable? (1/2) |
4.2.11. | Is BECCS sustainable? (2/2) |
4.2.12. | Network connecting bioethanol plants for BECCS |
4.2.13. | Biorecro |
4.2.14. | BECCS for hydrogen production and carbon removal |
4.2.15. | What is biochar? |
4.3. | Biochar and bio-oil |
4.3.1. | How is biochar produced? (1/2) |
4.3.2. | How is biochar produced? (2/2) |
4.3.3. | Biochar feedstocks |
4.3.4. | Biochar applications |
4.3.5. | Economic considerations in biochar production |
4.3.6. | Biochar: market and business model |
4.3.7. | The state of the biochar market |
4.3.8. | Key players in biochar by technology readiness level |
4.3.9. | Certified biochar players |
4.3.10. | Takachar |
4.3.11. | Drivers and barriers to biochar market uptake |
4.3.12. | Biochar: key takeaways |
4.4. | Other BiCRS solutions |
4.4.1. | Bio-oil geological storage for CDR |
4.4.2. | Bio-oil-based CDR: pros and cons |
4.4.3. | Wood harvesting and storage (WHS) as a CDR tool |
4.4.4. | Bio-based construction materials as a CDR tool |
4.4.5. | BiCRS company landscape |
4.4.6. | BiCRS: key takeaways |
5. | NATURE-BASED CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL |
5.1. | Introduction |
5.2. | Land-based carbon dioxide removal |
5.2.1. | Why land-based carbon dioxide removal? |
5.3. | Land-based CDR: afforestation and reforestation |
5.3.1. | The CDR potential of afforestation and reforestation |
5.3.2. | The case for and against A/R for climate mitigation |
5.3.3. | Technologies in A/R: remote sensing |
5.3.4. | Robotics: forestry mapping with drones |
5.3.5. | Other companies applying robotics to A/R |
5.3.6. | Robotic foresters |
5.3.7. | Automation in forest fire detection |
5.3.8. | Photosynthesis enhancement |
5.3.9. | Forest carbon projects for carbon offset credits |
5.3.10. | Comparing A/R and BECCS solutions |
5.3.11. | Afforestation and reforestation: key takeaways |
5.4. | Land-based CDR: soil carbon sequestration |
5.4.1. | What is soil carbon sequestration (SCS)? |
5.4.2. | The soil carbon sequestration potential is vast |
5.4.3. | Agricultural management practices to improve soil carbon sequestration |
5.4.4. | Challenges in SCS deployment |
5.4.5. | The soil carbon sequestration value chain |
5.4.6. | The soil carbon sequestration value chain: the roles |
5.4.7. | Marketplaces for SCS-based CDR credits |
5.4.8. | Propagate Ventures |
5.4.9. | Soil carbon sequestration pros and cons |
5.4.10. | Soil carbon sequestration: key takeaways |
5.5. | Mineralization-based CDR |
5.5.1. | CO₂ mineralization is key for CDR |
5.5.2. | Ex situ mineralization CDR methods |
5.5.3. | Source materials for ex situ mineralization |
5.5.4. | Ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes |
5.5.5. | R&D developments in ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes |
5.5.6. | Carbin Minerals |
5.5.7. | Oxide looping |
5.5.8. | Heirloom |
5.5.9. | Enhanced weathering |
5.5.10. | Enhanced weathering attributes |
5.5.11. | Key companies in enhanced weathering |
5.5.12. | Mineralization: key takeaways |
5.6. | Ocean-based carbon dioxide removal |
5.6.1. | Why ocean-based CDR? |
5.6.2. | Ocean-based CDR methods |
5.7. | Ocean-based CDR: abiotic methods |
5.7.1. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) |
5.7.2. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement status |
5.7.3. | Direct ocean capture (DOC) or electrochemical ocean CDR |
5.7.4. | Direct ocean capture: economics and status |
5.7.5. | Key players in electrochemical ocean CDR methods |
5.7.6. | Captura |
5.7.7. | Artificial downwelling |
5.8. | Ocean-based CDR: biotic methods |
5.8.1. | Coastal blue carbon |
5.8.2. | Algal cultivation |
5.8.3. | Ocean fertilization |
5.8.4. | Artificial upwelling |
5.8.5. | Key biotic ocean-based CDR players |
5.8.6. | Running Tide |
5.8.7. | CarbonWave |
5.8.8. | The governance challenge in large-scale deployment of ocean CDR |
5.8.9. | Ocean-based CDR: key takeaways |
6. | CDR MARKET FORECASTS |
6.1. | Forecasting methodology and assumptions (1/2) |
6.2. | Forecasting methodology and assumptions (2/2) |
6.3. | Price estimate methodology |
6.4. | CDR price forecast (US$/tCO₂) |
6.5. | CO₂ removal volume capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.6. | CO₂ removal revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.7. | Engineered vs nature-based CDR: volume and revenue forecast |
6.8. | CDR market forecast overall discussion |
6.9. | DACCS removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.10. | DACCS revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.11. | DACCS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.12. | DACCS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.13. | BECCS removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.14. | Biochar and bio-oil removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.15. | BiCRS revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.16. | BiCRS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.17. | BiCRS market forecast discussion (2/2) |
6.18. | Land-based CDR retired volumes forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.19. | Land-based CDR market forecast discussion |
6.20. | Ex-situ mineralization removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.21. | Ex-situ mineralization market forecast discussion |
6.22. | Ocean-based CDR capacity forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.23. | Ocean-based CDR market forecast discussion |
6.24. | CDR volume forecast data table (Mtpa) |
6.25. | CDR revenue forecast data table (million USD) |
7. | APPENDIX |
7.1. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (1/3) |
7.2. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (2/3) |
7.3. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (3/3) |
7.4. | Direct air capture companies (1/2) |
7.5. | Direct air capture companies (2/2) |
7.6. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (1/3) |
7.7. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (2/3) |
7.8. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (3/3) |
Slides | 270 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2040 |
ISBN | 9781915514219 |